Table of Contents
The concept of identifying as a different gender has been a long-standing issue in society. However, the recent acceptance of transgender individuals has paved the way for the emergence of other identities, such as transracial, transabled, and transspecies. While the debate over these identities is ongoing, it is important to consider their validity and the potential consequences they may bring. This article will explore each identity and its potential implications.
Transracial Identity
Transracial identity involves identifying as a different race than one’s actual race. While some individuals argue that they can identify as a different race based on their cultural and social experiences, others argue that race is an immutable characteristic and that identifying as a different race is a form of cultural appropriation. The issue becomes even more complicated when it involves individuals who choose to identify as a different race without experiencing the discrimination and oppression that come with that identity.
For example, in 2015, Rachel Dolezal, a white woman, claimed to be black and even led a chapter of the NAACP until she was exposed. Dolezal argued that she identified as black based on her personal experiences and that her racial identity was a form of self-expression. However, her case sparked controversy and debate, with some arguing that she was a liar and an imposter who was appropriating black culture. Others argued that her identity should be respected and that she was fighting against the oppression and discrimination that come with being black.
Transabled Identity
Transabled identity involves identifying as disabled, despite being physically healthy. Some individuals argue that they can identify as disabled based on their personal experiences, and that this identity should be respected. However, others argue that identifying as disabled without actually experiencing the challenges and discrimination that come with that identity is a form of ableism.
For example, in 2015, a man in Great Britain cut off his own arm because he felt like an amputee. He argued that he identified as disabled and that his physical body did not match his identity. Similarly, a woman in North Carolina poured drain cleaner in her eyes because she felt blind. While these cases are extreme, they highlight the potential dangers of identifying as disabled without actually experiencing the challenges and discrimination that come with that identity.
Transspecies Identity
Transspecies identity involves identifying as a different species than one’s actual species. Some individuals believe that they are not human and that they identify as animals. This identity has sparked debates about the boundaries of identity and the relationship between humans and animals. While some argue that individuals should be free to identify as they wish, others argue that identifying as a different species is a form of delusion that should not be enabled or accepted.
For example, in 2018, a man in Norway legally changed his name to “Human” and identified as a cat. He argued that he identified as a feline and that his identity should be respected. Similarly, in 2016, a woman in Russia identified as a dolphin and even developed a dolphin-like tail through surgery. While these cases are extreme, they highlight the potential dangers of identifying as a different species and the implications it may bring.
Transage Identity
Transage identity involves identifying as a different age than one’s actual age. Some individuals believe that they are not the age that they appear to be and that they identify as a different age. This identity has sparked debates about the relationship between age and identity and the implications of identifying as a different age.
For example, in 2017, a man in the Netherlands identified as a 20-year-old despite being 69 years old. He argued that he identified as a different age and that his age should be legally changed. Similarly, in 2018, a man in Canada identified as a six-year-old girl and was legally adopted by a couple. While these cases are extreme, they highlight the potential implications of identifying as a different age and the impact it may have on one’s life.
Dilemmas Faced
The emergence of these identities poses several dilemmas for society. On the one hand, individuals should be free to identify as they wish, and their identities should be respected. However, on the other hand, identifying as a different race, disability, species, or age can have significant implications for the individual and society as a whole.
For example, if individuals are allowed to identify as a different race without experiencing the discrimination and oppression that come with that identity, it may trivialize the experiences of individuals who have faced these challenges. Similarly, if individuals are allowed to identify as disabled without actually experiencing the challenges and discrimination that come with that identity, it may undermine the experiences of individuals who have lived with disabilities.
Furthermore, if individuals are allowed to identify as a different species, it may raise questions about the relationship between humans and animals and may lead to ethical concerns about animal welfare. Similarly, if individuals are allowed to identify as a different age, it may lead to ethical concerns about the responsibilities and rights of individuals at different ages.
Balancing Acceptance and Objectivity
Ultimately, the question of where to draw the line between subjective identity and objective reality is a complex one that requires careful consideration. While we should strive to be accepting and tolerant of all individuals, we must also be careful not to sacrifice objectivity and reality in the process.
One way to balance acceptance and objectivity is to consider the harm that may come from certain identities. For example, while accepting transgender identities has been a positive step towards greater understanding and tolerance, it is important to consider the potential harm that may come from accepting identities that do not correspond with objective reality.
Another way to balance acceptance and objectivity is to consider the rights of others. While individuals have the right to identify as they choose, they do not have the right to harm others or infringe upon their rights. For example, if a grown man identifies as a baby, he may have the right to identify as such, but he does not have the right to demand care from a nanny or to harm himself in pursuit of this identity.
It is also important to consider the potential impact of subjective identities on broader society. As the speaker in the video suggests, sacrificing objectivity and reality can lead to cultural absurdity. While it is important to be accepting and tolerant of all individuals, we must also be mindful of the potential impact that accepting certain identities may have on society as a whole.
One potential solution to the complexities of identity is to find a balance between acceptance and objectivity. This balance may involve accepting individuals’ self-identification while also recognizing objective reality and the potential harm that may come from certain identities.
Another potential solution is to encourage individuals to seek professional help if they are struggling with their identity. Mental health professionals can help individuals explore their identity in a safe and healthy way, without sacrificing objectivity and reality.
In conclusion, the concept of identity is a complex and nuanced one that requires careful consideration. While the acceptance of transgender individuals and their identities has been a positive step towards greater understanding and tolerance, it is important to be mindful of the potential dangers of sacrificing objectivity and reality for the sake of subjective identity. By finding a balance between acceptance and objectivity, we can create a more compassionate and understanding society while also preserving objective reality and protecting the rights of others.